MongoDB vs MySQL- A Brief Comparison

Databases play a pivotal role in the world of software development. These databases power everything from small business websites to massive cloud-based applications. Choosing the right database management system can dramatically affect the performance, functionality, and scalability of your applications. Two of the most popular databases in the industry are MongoDB and MySQL. If you are keen to know about the big debate of “MongoDB vs My SQL”, we will help you to make an informed decision on which side you should pick!  

Both MongoDB and MySQL have their advantages and disadvantages. Your choice to utilise them will depend on a few factors. These factors are mainly the data model, performance needs, scalability, and the specific use-case scenario. Check out this blog, where we discuss the difference between MongoDB and MySQL, including their features, adaptability, and use cases. 

Table of Contents 

1) What is MongoDB? 

2) What is MySQL? 

3) Key Differences Between MongoDB and MySQL 

      a) Schema 

      b) Data types and storage 

      c) Performance and Speed 

      d) Scalability 

      e) Features 

      f) Adaptability 

      g) Use cases 

4) Conclusion 

What is MongoDB? 

MongoDB is a NoSQL database that provides high performance, high availability, and easy scalability. It diverges from the traditional table-based relational database structure in favour of JSON-like documents with optional schemas. Thus, it makes the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster. 

With MongoDB, data is stored in flexible, JSON-like documents. This signifies that the fields can differ from one document to the other and data structure can be changed over time. This dynamic schema makes it potent for working with large volumes of rapidly changing data, whether structured, semi-structured, or unstructured. 

Expand your technical skills today with our course on App and Web Development Training 

What is MySQL? 

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS). It is widely acknowledged for its reliability, speed, and ease of use. It was first developed by the Swedish company MySQL AB, which was subsequently acquired by Oracle Corporation. MySQL's functionality is grounded in the use of Structured Query Language (SQL), a popular language for managing and manipulating data. 

If you want to know the versatility of MySQL is demonstrated in its wide-ranging applications. From small-scale personal projects and web applications to large enterprise systems, MySQL is employed extensively. It powers numerous content management systems (like WordPress) and e-commerce platforms and is commonly used for data warehousing. Its flexibility and robustness make MySQL a popular choice in the realm of database technologies. 

Key Differences Between MongoDB and MySQL 

Let us dive deep into the key differences between MongoDB vs MySQL:

Schema 

1) MongoDB is known for its schema-less or dynamic schema design. This means that the database does not require a predefined schema to structure the data. Instead, the data structure can be altered dynamically. This accommodates the data's natural form.  

2) In MongoDB, the data is stored in flexible, JSON-like documents. Each of them can hold different sets of key-value pairs. 

3) This schema-less design enables storing complex hierarchical data structures with ease. It accommodates diverse data types, including other documents, arrays, and arrays of documents.  

Whereas: 

a) MySQL, as a relational database management system, operates based on a predefined schema. This implies that the structure of the data must be established before data insertion.  

b) Data in MySQL is organised into tables consisting of rows and columns. Each column requires a datatype, and each row represents a unique record. 

c) This structured approach to data storage means that the tables in MySQL are connected through primary and foreign keys. This allows the formation of complex relationships between data.  

Data types and storage 

1) MongoDB uses the BSON (Binary JSON) format for data storage. BSON extends the JSON model to provide additional data types ordered fields and to be efficient for encoding and decoding within different languages.   

2) Data in MongoDB is stored in flexible, JSON-like documents where each document can be seen as a row in relational databases. These documents can hold different sets of key-value pairs, key-array pairs, or even nested documents. 

3) It also allows for the storage of complex hierarchical data structures and accommodating a wide variety of data types. These data types include but are not limited to strings, numbers, Booleans, arrays, and objects. 

Whereas: 

a) MySQL, being a Relational Database Management System (RDBMS), organises data into structured tables with rows and columns. Each column in a table relates to a certain data type, and each row represents a unique record.  

b) MySQL supports a huge variety of data types in several categories: numeric types, date and time types, string types, spatial types, and JSON. It has precise rules about what kind of data you can put into each type.  

c) For instance, you can store whole numbers, real numbers, strings, dates, or even raw binary data. Data types determine the type of operations that can be applied to the data. It also provides a layer of abstraction to the users by automatically converting the data to a format compatible with the operations.  

Performance and speed 

1) MongoDB is renowned for its high write speed, a feature that comes in handy when handling heavy data loads or complex data structures. Its performance is primarily due to its capability to handle large volumes of unstructured, semi-structured, or structured data with equal efficiency. 

2) One of MongoDB's defining features contributing to its performance is its support for horizontal scalability through sharding.  

3) This allows the database to distribute data across multiple servers, enhancing read and write speeds. It also effectively manages large datasets. Moreover, MongoDB supports indexing, which can significantly enhance query speed by enabling efficient searches of the database. Its schema-less design also contributes to speed as it eliminates the need for expensive joins when querying. 

However, in MySQL: 

a) MySQL shines in applications that require complex querying and transactional consistency. It excels in read-heavy operations due to its structured data storage model. 

b) MySQL is efficient for querying relational databases. Its indexing capabilities, coupled with its powerful query optimiser, make it ideal for executing complex queries rapidly and efficiently. 

c) Additionally, it supports Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability (ACID). Along with that, it also supports compliant transactions, ensuring data reliability and integrity. This is critical for applications requiring transactional consistency.  

Transform your idea into a fully-fledged app – Register for our Mobile App Development Training 

Scalability 

1) MongoDB is known for its horizontal scalability. This is achieved through a process known as sharding. Sharding is a process of distributing data across a number of servers.  

2) As the data size grows, more machines can be added to accommodate it. Sharding helps in managing large datasets and high throughput applications by distributing the data among multiple servers.  

3) It ensures that a system can handle increased traffic by horizontally partitioning data across multiple databases. This feature is particularly useful for cloud-based infrastructure. This helps it to input its expanding capacity. Now, this capacity can be as simple as adding more servers to the network. 

Whereas: 

a) MySQL typically scales vertically. This means improving performance by adding more power (CPU, RAM, SSD) to an existing machine.  

b) In vertical scaling, the data resides on a single server. Hence, scaling is achieved by enhancing the hardware capabilities of that server. 

c) For certain applications, MySQL can also be scaled horizontally through replication. This is achieved by copying data from one database server to another. This helps in distributing the read traffic among these servers.  

d) However, it can become complex and challenging to manage for write-heavy applications as all write operations need to be synchronised across servers.
 

Features 

In MongoDB: 

1) Flexible schema: The dynamic schema allows for easy data modifications and supports complex hierarchical data structures. 

2) Sharding: Sharding facilitates horizontal scaling, effectively handling large data sets and high-throughput operations. 

3) Replication: MongoDB's replica sets ensure high availability of data, with secondary replicas ready to take over should the primary replica fail.  

Whereas in MySQL: 

a) Structured query language: MySQL utilises SQL for complex data manipulation and relationships, enabling intricate operations with a single query. 

b) ACID compliance: As an ACID-compliant database, MySQL guarantees the reliability and integrity of transactions.  

c) Replication: MySQL's replication feature allows for the creation of exact database copies on separate machines, enabling backups, read scaling, and failover.  

Adaptability 

1) Schema flexibility: MongoDB's dynamic schema allows data structures to evolve over time, making it adaptable to varying data requirements. 

2) Diverse data types: It can tackle a variety of different data types, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, enabling it to cater to diverse application needs. 

3) Horizontal scalability: Through sharding, MongoDB can adapt to increasing data loads by distributing data across multiple servers.  

In MySQL:  

a) Structured data handling: It thrives in environments where data relationships and integrity are of high importance, adapting well to applications requiring complex queries and transactional consistency.  

b) Vertical scaling: MySQL adapts to growing data demands by boosting the hardware capabilities of its server, a process known as vertical scaling.  

c) Community support: With its wide usage and strong community support, it continuously adapts to new trends, resolving issues and adding requested features. 

Use cases 

1) Big data applications: MongoDB is ideal for applications that need to process and analyse large amounts of diverse data types in real-time.  

2) Content Management Systems (CMS): Its flexible schema and ability to handle diverse data types make it well-suited for dynamic and complex content. 

3) Real-time analytics and Internet of Things (IoT): MongoDB's horizontal scalability and real-time processing capabilities make it a great fit for real-time analytics and IoT applications.  

Whereas in MySQL: 

a) Web-based applications: MySQL is a great fit for web-based applications, especially those using the Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Python/Perl (LAMP) stack 

b) E-commerce: MySQL is widely used in online shopping applications due to its robust transactional support and ability to handle complex queries efficiently.  

c) Data warehousing and reporting: MySQL's structured data storage, ACID compliance, and efficient SQL querying make it ideal for data warehousing and reporting applications.



 

Conclusion 

In the end, both MongoDB and MySQL bring distinct strengths to the table. Each is uniquely tailored for specific use cases. MongoDB stands out with its flexible schema and scalability, making it perfect for Big Data and IoT applications. Whereas MySQL excels in handling structured data and complex queries, making it a go-to choice for web-based applications and data warehousing. Ultimately, your specific application needs and requirements will guide your choice between MongoDB and MySQL. 

Grab the MySQL Cheat Sheet and become a MySQL pro in no time!