OODA vs PDCA: Which one is Better?

OODA and PDCA are two prominent methodologies for continuous improvement and decision-making. They help organisations enhance efficiency, adaptability, and problem-solving capabilities. However, OODA and PDCA have distinct processes, strengths, and applications that suit different environments and challenges. Therefore, one question naturally arises: "OODA vs PDCA, which one should you pick?" 

In this blog, we will compare OODA vs PDCA in terms of suitability for various industries, required resources, complexity of problems addressed, flexibility, adaptability, and speed of implementation. We will also highlight the differences between OODA and PDCA and how they impact organisational effectiveness. By the end of this blog, you will have a clear understanding of the two methodologies and be able to choose the best approach for achieving your goals. 

Table of Contents 

1) What is OODA? 

   a) Benefits of OODA 

   b) How to Develop an OODA? 

2) What is PDCA? 

   a) Benefits of PDCA 

   b) How to Develop a PDCA? 

3) Key Differences Between PDCA and OODA 

4) Conclusion 

What is OODA? 

The OODA Loop, which stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act, was developed by U.S. Air Force Colonel John Boyd. Initially designed for combat operations, this framework aims to encourage faster and more effective decision-making in high-stakes, dynamic environments. Over time, the OODA Loop has transcended its military origins and is now widely used in business and Crisis Management to support rapid decision-making and adaptive strategies, as outlined in the ISO 17020 Guide, which helps organisations implement effective and adaptive quality control systems.

a) Observe: This is the initial phase where you gather raw data from your environment. It involves actively scanning for information that could influence your decisions, such as market trends, customer feedback, or any other actionable data. 

b) Orient: In this phase, you process the gathered information using your existing knowledge, cultural background, and prior experiences. This stage involves contextual analysis to interpret the raw data effectively. 

c) Decide: Based on the orientation phase, you generate a set of possible actions or decisions. You evaluate the pros and cons of each available option and select the best course of action for your specific situation. 

d) Act: Finally, you implement the chosen decision. Unlike the PDCA cycle's 'Do' phase, which often involves a small-scale test, the OODA Loop's 'Act' phase is typically swift and large-scale, aiming for immediate results. 

The Benefits of OODA 

The true advantage of the OODA cycle lies in its ability to respond effectively to unpredictable or hazardous situations. It's an excellent strategy for businesses to navigate threatening circumstances. By focusing on observing and orienting around emerging external factors, businesses can position themselves more favourably, akin to steering a ship into a wave rather than letting it hit the side. This approach, while still challenging, significantly increases the chances of successfully weathering the storm. 

How to Develop an OODA? 

Implementing the OODA cycle is straightforward if leaders are willing to adopt a new perspective and management style. The method emphasises staying calm while gathering information, evaluating the nature of a problem, and deciding on the best solution for the situation. It involves analysing and reacting swiftly. Leaders should focus on objective observation and actively seek feedback from others to make informed decisions. 

By incorporating the OODA cycle, businesses can enhance their agility and resilience, ensuring they are better prepared to face unexpected challenges.
 

What is PDCA? 

What is PDCA, also popularly known as the Deming Wheel or Shewhart Cycle, is a four-step model for continuous improvement and problem-solving. Developed by American statistician Walter Shewhart and popularised by W. Edwards Deming, this cycle originated in quality control for mid-20th-century manufacturing processes. Over time, it has become a universal model for quality management across several industries and sectors. 

a) Plan: Identify a problem or improvement area and plan a change. This phase involves setting objectives, determining necessary resources, and establishing metrics to gauge success or failure. 

b) Do: Implement the planned change on a small scale as a pilot test. Document all changes and collect data for later analysis. 

c) Check: Analyse the data collected during the ‘Do’ phase to evaluate whether the change led to improvement and met the objectives set in the ‘Plan’ phase. 

d) Act: If the change is successful, implement it on a broader scale. If not, begin the cycle anew, refining the plan with insights gained from the previous steps. 

By following this structured approach, organisations can systematically improve processes, enhance quality, and achieve operational excellence. 

The Benefits of PDCA 

PDCA is a cautious and deliberate management approach that can be as ambitious or prudent as needed. It is a flexible, adaptable method suited for nearly any business environment. The structure of PDCA is similar to the Six Sigma framework, particularly when comparing PDCA vs DMAIC, as both methodologies follow a systematic approach to continuous improvement, with DMAIC focusing on Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control.

How to Develop a PDCA? 

a) Establish Responsibility and Scope: Define who is responsible for the initiative and the project's scope. A clear chain of command is essential in a workplace with multiple employees. Clearly outlining the project's scope helps maintain focus and ensures progress towards a specific goal. 

b) Focus on Specific Issues: Although it may seem counterintuitive, focusing on narrow or specific issues, such as eliminating non-value-added (NVA) time delays in production, is effective. PDCA is a cycle aimed at continual improvement by addressing one inefficiency at a time. 

For example, a company might target the PDCA cycle at reducing NVA time across its production process. By continually implementing solutions, the company can incrementally improve efficiency and productivity. 

Unlock process improvement mastery with our DMAIC Training – Join today and transform your skills! 

Key Differences Between PDCA and OODA

1) Suitability for Various Industries 

The PDCA cycle was developed from manufacturing and quality control practices and is widely adopted in industries focused on process optimisation and continuous improvement, such as healthcare, education, logistics, and manufacturing. Its structured, methodical approach makes it ideal for environments where processes benefit from incremental enhancements.  

On the other hand, the OODA Loop, developed by U.S. Air Force Colonel John Boyd, excels in industries requiring rapid decision-making and adaptability. It is particularly effective in dynamic and high-stakes environments like emergency services, financial trading, cybersecurity, and business management. The ability of OODA to facilitate quick, responsive actions makes it a versatile tool across various fields. 

2) Required Resources 

Implementing PDCA involves significant resources for detailed planning, extensive data collection, and thorough analysis. The iterative nature of PDCA means that resources are continually allocated to evaluate and refine processes through multiple cycles, often involving detailed documentation and rigorous oversight.  

Conversely, while OODA emphasises speed, it still demands substantial resources for effective observation and orientation, including real-time data collection and specialised technologies. The rapid cycle of OODA requires tools and systems that support quick data analysis and decision-making, often necessitating advanced analytics and communication platforms. 

3) Complexity of Problems Addressed 

PDCA is best suited for well-defined problems that benefit from a structured, methodical approach. It excels in environments where issues can be incrementally improved through systematic processes, making it ideal for routine and predictable challenges. However, it may struggle with highly complex, adaptive challenges that require immediate and flexible responses.  

In contrast, OODA excels in high-stakes, complex scenarios where problems are dynamic and rapidly changing. Its iterative loop is designed to handle situations requiring swift, adaptive decision-making, making it particularly effective for addressing unpredictable challenges where quick reactions are critical to success. 

Become a leader in inspection standards with our ISO 17020 Lead Auditor Training – Register now to advance your auditing skills and expertise! 

4) Flexibility and Adaptability 

PDCA, while flexible in its application across various industries, has a structured nature that can make it challenging to implement rapid changes. Its methodical approach involves predefined steps that may limit its adaptability in fast-paced, unpredictable environments. 

On the other hand, OODA is inherently adaptable, allowing for quick strategy shifts and rapid adjustments. This makes it ideal for environments where conditions change rapidly and unpredictably. OODA’s framework supports continuous real-time feedback and adjustment, essential for navigating complex, fluid situations. 

5) Speed of Implementation 

PDCA is typically more deliberate and time-consuming due to its emphasis on detailed planning and thorough checking phases. Each cycle aims for gradual improvement, which can slow down immediate implementation. The methodical nature of PDCA ensures that changes are well-considered and tested, but this can delay rapid responses.  

In contrast, OODA is designed for rapid decision-making and quick implementation. Its ‘Act’ phase is swift and often involves immediate, large-scale actions without extensive preliminary testing. The focus on quick observation, orientation, decision, and action allows for fast responses to emerging threats and opportunities. 

Transform your inspection processes with our ISO 17020 Lead Implementer Training – sign up now to lead with confidence! 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, understanding the differences in OODA vs PDCA helps organisations choose the right framework for their needs. PDCA’s structured approach suits stable environments, while OODA’s rapid, adaptive cycle is ideal for dynamic scenarios, ensuring effective navigation of routine and unpredictable challenges. For deeper insights, consult Lean Sigma resources. 

Elevate your inspection standards with our comprehensive ISO 17020 Trainings – Become a certified expert!