CloudFormation vs Terraform: A Detailed Comparison

Cloud is currently both a cutting-edge technology and a cutthroat arena where numerous Cloud Management tools and IaCs are vying for the spotlight trying to be the best! Two giants that have been stealing the show in this regard are CloudFormation and Terraform, with the former offering AWS-native ease and the latter boasting multi-cloud flexibility. But which one truly reigns supreme? This is precisely what this blog answers as it dives deep into the CloudFormation vs Terraform debate, laying bare every essential distinction 

Table of Contents

1) What is CloudFormation?

2) What is Terraform?

3) Difference between CloudFormation and Terraform

      a) Syntax Variation

      b) Flexibility and Dynamism

      c) Functionality and Available Operations

      d) Management of Infrastructure State

      e) Compatibility with Cloud Services

      f) Support for Businesses

      g) Rolling Back

      h) Language

      i) Simplicity and User-friendliness

      j) Expense and Pricing

4) Conclusion

What is CloudFormation?

CloudFormation, a service by Amazon Web Services (AWS), streamlines the provisioning of AWS infrastructure resources. It operates based on JSON or YAML templates, enabling users to define the desired configuration of resources in a declarative manner. With CloudFormation, users define required components like EC2 instances, databases, and networking resources, including configurations and interdependencies. 

The specifications are included in a template that makes it easier for the resources to be supplied regularly. Consistency, repeatability, and version control are promoted by the single and flexible infrastructure management approach offered by CloudFormation templates. Entire resource stacks are able to be easily created, updated, and deleted by users, removing the need for laborious processes and reducing the possibility of mistakes in configuration.

Moreover, CloudFormation seamlessly integrates with various AWS services and features, including IAM roles, CloudWatch alarms, and Lambda functions. This enables comprehensive management of Cloud infrastructure resources within a unified platform.
 

What is Terraform?

Terraform is an open-source Infrastructure as Code tool developed by HashiCorp that enables users build infrastructure across numerous Cloud providers. A declarative configuration language forms its basis, allowing simple and brief code to define the ideal configuration of the infrastructure.

Terraform emphasises outcomes over methods, simplifying provisioning workflows for clarity and ease of use. By abstracting away the intricacies of Cloud Infrastructure Management, Terraform enables seamless orchestration of resources, regardless of the underlying provider.

Its versatility extends beyond individual Cloud environments, offering a unified approach to managing multi-cloud deployments. Terraform enables efficient, scalable infrastructure management, automates tasks, and fosters agility in the dynamic Cloud environment.

Join our comprehensive Terraform Training for seamless Cloud Infrastructure Management!

Difference Between CloudFormation and Terraform

Understanding the differences between CloudFormation and Terraform is crucial for making informed decisions about managing Cloud infrastructure.

1) Syntax Variation

AWS CloudFormation relies on JSON or YAML templates to define infrastructure. These templates can become verbose and complex, especially for large deployments. Users need to be proficient in JSON or YAML syntax to effectively manage CloudFormation templates. JSON and YAML, though common, may lack the intuitiveness and conciseness required for intricate infrastructure configurations.

Terraform uses its declarative language, HashiCorp Configuration Language. HCL offers a more concise and readable syntax than JSON or YAML. It provides a simpler and more intuitive way to describe infrastructure components and their relationships. This makes Terraform configurations easier to understand and maintain, enhancing overall productivity and reducing the learning curve for new users.

2) Flexibility and Dynamism

CloudFormation's rigidity lies in its tight integration with AWS services, limiting flexibility to AWS-only environments. While it excels in managing AWS resources, its monolithic approach lacks the agility and versatility of Terraform's multi-cloud capabilities. CloudFormation users may find themselves constrained by AWS-centric workflows, hindering their ability to adopt alternative Cloud providers or hybrid Cloud architectures.

In contrast, Terraform's modular design and diverse provider ecosystem provide exceptional flexibility. Reusable modules simplify management across projects, while multi-cloud support allows seamless deployment across various providers, freeing organisations from vendor lock-in. This agility enables teams to quickly adapt to changing needs and effortlessly scale infrastructure.

3) Functionality and Available Operations

CloudFormation is an AWS service that enables users to provision and manage AWS infrastructure resources using JSON or YAML templates. It simplifies defining and deploying Cloud resources, enabling automation and consistency in managing infrastructure within the AWS ecosystem.

Terraform, developed by HashiCorp, is an open-source infrastructure as a code tool that enables the defining and provisioning of infrastructure resources across multiple Cloud providers  using a declarative configuration language called HashiCorp Configuration Language. It offers a unified approach to managing infrastructure and supports a wide range of Cloud services.

Elevate your skills with AWS CloudFormation Training- join now to unlock advanced Cloud Management techniques!

4) State Management

CloudFormation manages the infrastructure state using stacks, which represent a collection of AWS resources that are provisioned and managed together. The state of the stack is maintained by CloudFormation and includes information about the resources provisioned, their configurations, and their dependencies. CloudFormation uses this state to track changes and manage the lifecycle of the stack and its resources.

Terraform manages infrastructure state by keeping track of the current state of the resources defined in its configuration files. This state is stored locally or remotely and serves as a record of the deployed infrastructure's status. Terraform uses state to plan and execute changes, ensuring actual infrastructure aligns with desired configuration files.

5) Compatibility with Cloud Services

CloudFormation is tightly integrated with Amazon Web Services and primarily supports provisioning and managing resources within the AWS ecosystem. While CloudFormation offers comprehensive support for AWS services and features, its compatibility is limited to the AWS Cloud platform. This limitation makes it less versatile for multi-cloud deployments than Terraform.

Terraform offers broad compatibility with various Cloud service providers, including AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and others. Its modular design allows users to define and manage resources across multiple cloud platforms. This flexibility avoids vendor lock-in and is enabled by an extensive provider ecosystem and unified configuration language.

6) Support for Businesses

CloudFormation is supported by Amazon Web Services and benefits from AWS's comprehensive support infrastructure. AWS offers support plans for businesses, including enterprise-level options with 24/7 access to experts, personalised assistance, and architectural guidance. AWS also offers extensive documentation, forums, and user communities to support CloudFormation users.

Terraform offers robust support for businesses through various channels. HashiCorp, behind Terraform, offers commercial support, including enterprise-level plans with SLAs, dedicated engineers, and access to training. Additionally, Terraform has a vibrant community and extensive documentation, offering additional resources and assistance to users.

Begin your AWS Cloud Practitioner Training now to master cloud essentials!

7) Rolling Back

CloudFormation does not have built-in rollback capabilities like Terraform. Users can manually roll back changes by updating the stack with a known configuration or by deleting and recreating it. CloudFormation supports change sets, enabling users to preview changes and minimising the risk of errors and the need for rollback.

Terraform provides mechanisms for rolling back infrastructure changes in case of errors or unexpected outcomes. It maintains a state file that records the desired state of the infrastructure, allowing users to revert to previous configurations easily. Additionally, Terraform supports version control systems, enabling users to track changes and roll back to specific versions if necessary.

8) Language

CloudFormation templates are written in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) or Yet Another Markup Language (YAML) formats. JSON is a widely used data interchange format, while YAML is known for its readability and simplicity. CloudFormation templates define AWS resources, their properties, and their relationships using these formats, providing a structured and standardised approach to infrastructure provisioning.

Terraform uses its declarative configuration language called HashiCorp Configuration Language. HCL is designed to be human-readable and easy to understand, resembling traditional configuration formats. It allows users to define infrastructure resources, dependencies, and configurations in a concise and intuitive manner, enhancing readability and maintainability.

9) Simplicity and User-friendliness

CloudFormation aims for simplicity and user-friendliness by providing predefined templates and a straightforward workflow for provisioning AWS resources. While templates may become verbose for complex setups, CloudFormation's integration with AWS services offers an intuitive user experience. 

Additionally, its graphical interface in the AWS Management Console enhances usability. However, managing large-scale deployments may require additional effort and expertise due to the limitations of JSON or YAML syntax.

Terraform offers simplicity and user-friendliness through its declarative configuration language and modular design. With its human-readable syntax and straightforward approach, Terraform makes it easy for users to define and manage infrastructure resources. Its modular design allows for better organisation and reuse of configurations, simplifying complex deployments and enhancing overall user experience.

10) Expense and Pricing

CloudFormation does not incur additional costs beyond the usage fees for AWS resources provisioned through CloudFormation templates. Users are billed for the AWS resources they deploy, and there are no separate charges for using CloudFormation itself. However, it's essential to consider potential costs associated with AWS services used in CloudFormation stacks when estimating expenses.

Similarly, Terraform itself is open-source and free to use. However, there may be costs associated with using Cloud resources provisioned by Terraform, such as compute instances, storage, and network resources. Users are billed directly by the Cloud service providers based on their resource usage and pricing models.

Master AI techniques to automate your Cloud infrastructure with our Certified Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Cloud Professionals Course - Register now!

Terraform and AWS CloudFormation Use Cases 

The following four scenarios illustrate the use of both Terraform and CloudFormation:

Scenario 1:

An organisation that uses multiple Cloud providers such as Microsoft Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud also wants to manage everything related to its GitHub organisation through an IaC tool. Terraform is the viable option if a single tool must be picked in this scenario (Manage infrastructure from multiple Cloud providers and GitHub resources).

Scenario 2:

A company is heavily invested in AWS, uses numerous AWS services, and needs the most current integrations and features. While both options suit this scenario, CloudFormation has the upper hand as most features are included as soon as they go live in CloudFormation.

Scenario 3:

A company must build hundreds of environments with a similar template, and some small variables change. Terraform is the winning choice for this scenario because of the available modules and its ability to use conditionals, loops, and functions.

Scenario 4:

A company has a very complicated AWS Architecture involving intricate VPC configurations, IAM roles, and direct connections, and it needs strict governance and compliance structures. While both tools can work, AWS CloudFormation is better suited for the job. Its direct integration with AWS services ensures that configurations align closely with AWS’s recommended practices, making it easier to meet strict enterprise governance requirements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both CloudFormation and Terraform offer powerful capabilities for managing and provisioning Cloud infrastructure. CloudFormation vs Terraform choice depends on specific use cases, existing infrastructure, team preferences, and scalability requirements. If you’re already on AWS and using all AWS tools, CloudFormation may be the more convenient choice. But if you’re looking for additional flexibility from a Cloud-agnostic platform that integrates with AWS services Terraform will offer greater utility for your organisation.

Begin your Cloud Computing journey. Explore our Cloud Computing Training today!